New research has revealed that time-restricted eating, a form of intermittent fasting, is more sustainable over the long term than calorie counting when it comes to weight loss. The study, conducted by nutrition professor Krista Varady at the University of Illinois, Chicago, found that people who practiced time-restricted eating were able to lose weight and maintain that weight loss over the course of a year. The results, published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, show that time-restricted eaters lost an average of 10 pounds, while those who counted calories lost about 12 pounds. Although the weight loss was not significant, the study highlighted the potential of time-restricted eating as a lifestyle choice that can be maintained over a longer period of time. The findings suggest that time-restricted eating could be a viable alternative to calorie counting in achieving weight loss goals.
Time-restricted eating involves limiting eating to a specific window of time, usually around six to eight hours. This approach reduces calorie intake as people end up eating less. The study revealed that time-restricted eaters naturally reduced their daily calorie intake by approximately 400 calories, which is comparable to the calorie counting group. This “natural calorie restriction” is likely a result of having less time to eat, particularly in the post-dinner hours. Placing limits on when one eats can also help prevent mindless snacking and regulate appetite hormones.
The study also emphasized the importance of support and counseling in making weight loss more sustainable. Both weight-loss groups received regular counseling sessions with dieticians, which proved significant in helping them make healthy food choices and prevent weight regain. The inclusion of cognitive behavioral strategies further enhanced adherence to the weight loss regimen. Dr. Adam Gilden, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Colorado, highlighted the need for support and counseling, as many individuals who try time-restricted eating without guidance often struggle to achieve meaningful weight loss.
Overall, the study suggests that time-restricted eating can be an effective and sustainable weight loss strategy, particularly when supported by counseling and behavioral interventions. Unlike calorie counting, time-restricted eating offers a simpler and more manageable approach to reducing calorie intake. However, it is important to note that the research does not advocate for unhealthy eating habits but rather emphasizes the significance of eating during the daytime and avoiding nighttime eating, which has been associated with negative health outcomes. By focusing on when to eat rather than counting calories, individuals may find it easier to achieve their weight loss goals.
Denial of responsibility! SamacharCentrl is an automatic aggregator of Global media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, and all materials to their authors. For any complaint, please reach us at – [email protected]. We will take necessary action within 24 hours.
Rohit Malhotra is a medical expert and health journalist who offers evidence-based advice on fitness, nutrition, and mental well-being. His articles aim to help readers lead healthier lives.
